🔬 Research Contributions
Four significant contributions to population genetics and ancestry inference methodology
K=10 Model Validation
Cross-validation analysis across multiple K-values demonstrates K=10 provides optimal balance between model complexity and predictive accuracy for ancestry inference.
Technical Details: Cross-validation error of 0.51482 at K=10, representing improved resolution over K=8 (CV=0.51994) using 143,495 high-quality SNPs across 61,816 samples.
Ancient DNA Integration
Integration of personal genomics with curated ancient DNA databases, including analysis of Bronze/Iron Age Levantine populations and validation through multiple methodologies.
Methodology: AADR ancient DNA integration with multi-method validation including ADMIXTURE, IBD analysis, and PCA convergence for relationship verification.
Validated Ancient Connections
Identification of I16327.AG from Bronze/Iron Age Levant as closest genetic match (distance: 0.0206), confirmed through independent analytical methods.
Significance: 64.3% Middle Eastern/Levantine component validates connections to Bronze Age populations, with additional 23.4% Caucasus and 10.3% African components representing comprehensive ancestry profile.
Methodological Framework
Development of multi-method validation framework combining ADMIXTURE population genetics with IBD analysis and PCA for comprehensive ancestry inference.
Innovation: Cross-validation optimization with convergent methodologies providing statistical confidence in ancient population relationships and ancestry component accuracy.
🎯 Key Discoveries
🔬 Curious Experiment: Dual Validation Framework
Personal experiment exploring dual validation approaches to distinguish population patterns from genealogical relationships. I16327.AG shows both closest population match (0.0206 distance) AND genealogical connection (8.873+ cM across Chr2-4).
Explore Dual Framework →🧬 Strongest Ancient Genealogical Relative
I21305.AG identified as strongest ancient genealogical relative with 24.367+ cM across Chr1-4, representing the largest individual ancient genomics analysis conducted with multi-chromosome validation.
View Ancient Matches →📊 Chr1-4 Analysis Complete
23.37 billion IBD segments analyzed across 4 chromosomes (18.2% complete), with validated connections including VK21 Viking (19+ cM) and revolutionary dual validation discoveries ongoing.
View Progress →🚀 Research Impact
🧪 Methodological Contributions
Population Genetics: Integration of individual genomic data with comprehensive ancient DNA databases using ADMIXTURE methodology
Validation Framework: Multi-method convergence including cross-validation, IBD analysis, and PCA for statistical confidence
Archaeological Integration: Validated connections to Bronze/Iron Age Levantine populations through genetic distance analysis
👋 New? Start Here
Not sure where to begin? Choose your path based on what interests you most:
🔬 Explore the Research
Dive deeper into the methodology, results, and implications of this groundbreaking analysis
📊 Complete Results
Comprehensive analysis results including ancestral components, ancient DNA connections, and statistical validation with interactive visualizations.
Explore Results🔬 Technical Methodology
Detailed technical methodology including ADMIXTURE analysis, cross-validation, and ancient DNA integration protocols with computational specifications.
View Methodology🏺 Ancestry Timelines
Interactive exploration of ancient DNA connections with timeline visualizations, population movements, and archaeological context spanning 15,000 years.
Ancient DNA Analysis❓ FAQ & About
Comprehensive answers to questions about the methodology, results, implications of genetic archaeology, and background on this research project.
Read FAQ⚠️ Preliminary Archaic Analysis
Experimental: Initial hap-IBD analysis suggests potential archaic human DNA signatures in Chr1-5 data. This analysis is preliminary and requires extensive validation before publication.
Note: Archaic DNA detection protocols are experimental and not yet scientifically validated. Results should be considered preliminary research only.